A comparison of three public speeches

Pathos is the quality of a persuasive presentation which appeals to the emotions of the audience. Do your words evoke feelings of … love? Do your visuals evoke feelings of compassion? Does your characterization of the competition evoke feelings of hate?

A comparison of three public speeches

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. He delivered a speech that convinced the Romans that the murder was unjust, invoking their rebellion. A battle erupted, and most of the conspirators committed suicide. The styles of the two speeches were very different from each other.

Brutus was first to speak. Brutus began by stating his case for killing Caesar. The crowd was confused and curious as to the reason for his death.

Material Information

His speech was formal, controlled, and it seems that all of the sentences are perfectly balanced. Brutus explained yet again that he loved Caesar, but that his assassination was for the good of Rome. Brutus explained that he still cared for Caesar and he still also claimed that Caesar was not good a good leader for Rome because he was ambitious.

He mourns his death. After he explained himself and his purpose, the people were reluctant to believe him, yet they were convinced for only a short while. Brutus leaves the scene and the podium for Antony to speak.

Antony wants the citizens to mutiny against the conspirators; he wants revenge.

Speech Making Technique – The compare and contrast

Antony also mentioned that Caesar was not ambitious, and stated three reasons: Caesar refused the crown three times, did not pocket the money he collected, instead putting it in the treasury, and most importantly, he felt for his people. Antony did an excellent job of persuading the crowd and moving them to mutiny, which he had initially described: Both characters shared their opinions, and in the end, only one got the approval of the crowd.

In this, Antony did an exceptional job of moving the crowd to mutiny. More essays like this:A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Communication Apprehension A Comparison of Three European Nations. A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Communication Apprehension A Comparison of Three European Nations.

About John Zimmer

webkandii.com; Sometimes you need to compare data and show this comparison easily to the audience. The final goal will be to have a visualization tool that help the audience to compare and explain what are the difference between two sets of data.5/5(2).

Quotations from the speeches and other works of Theodore Roosevelt Home > Resources > Quotations from the speeches and other works of Theodore Roosevelt Big Stick. Students then choose any three of the speeches and in a well-written essay compare and contrast how the speakers use rhetorical strategies to support their arguments.

A comparison of three public speeches

This can be done as homework outside of class or as an in-class essay on a fourth day. Types of Informative Speeches In the last section we examined how informative speakers need to be objective, credible, knowledgeable, and how they need to make the topic relevant to their audience.

This section discusses the four primary types of informative speeches. The most memorable speeches inspire, entertain, and praise. By blending stories and eloquence, great speeches highlight the core values motivating an audience. You might need to do this in a keynote address, a eulogy, or simply a business meeting.

Reorganisation of the public service: three speeches