We ask you, humbly, to help us.
Lloyd Is there any satisfactory way of reconciling the existence of an omnipotent and all-loving God with the existence of natural evil i. One of the central claims of the Judaeo-Christian tradition is the existence of an omnipotent and all-loving God. Against this is the observation that people and animals suffer evil.
By common sense, we would infer from this observation that God, as conceived in this tradition, does not exist - for, if He did, He would prevent the evil. Such occurrences enable people to be virtuous through: I shall examine a number of such arguments, but first it is useful to clarify the nature of such debate.
It is well known that people hold their religious beliefs because they are emotionally bound to them, primarily through their upbringing, and not because they have arrived at them by reasoning. Arguments in defence of religion arise retrospectively to support convictions that have already been secured by emotional persuasion.
Arguments for religion usually develop by the elaboration of hypotheses about what might be the case, in reaction to atheistic attacks. Likewise, at every step in this essay, one could in an instant formulate a hundred hypotheses to defend religion against my criticism, and for each hypothesis the refutation of it can be rebuffed by another hundred hypotheses, all equally baseless.
Grounds for supposing God is not omniscient The assignment for this essay mentions only that God is omnipotent and all-loving, and omits the other traditional attribute, of omniscience.
This approach gains some legitimacy thus: There are passages in the Bible where God is ignorant, such as Genesis 3. In this instance, we could suppose that God is asking a rhetorical question, for the purpose of inviting Adam to give an account of himself.
St Thomas Aquinas, in his "Summa contra Gentiles", argues at length that God knows particular facts, not just universal truths. Many theological theories arise in reaction to criticism of existing doctrines.
Therefore it would be in keeping with the traditions of theology if one were to hold the belief that God is not omniscient just because it offers a solution to the problem of evil.
Here are just five: God stands aloof from the world, and so cannot observe what happens in it.In explaining why God permits evil to occur, it is important to go beyond the fact that God created each of us with free will.
As an example, my oldest son had leukemia when he was 4 years old. In this essay I am going to examine the problem of evil. I will split it into two main parts; the problems raised for a religious believer by the existence of evil and the solution or answer to these problems.
One of the greatest problems facing a believer in a good, all-powerful god is the existence of what we call evil.
The argument from evil (or problem of evil) is the argument that an all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfectly good God would not allow any—or certain kinds of—evil or suffering to occur. Unlike the logical argument from evil, The essays below explore these issues in more detail.
I think evil is a human construct to make an opposite for the idea of good and if you think of scale with good on one end and evil on the other webkandii.com seems the line between good and evil blurs and even more so if you only take parts of a person and add it to the scale.
Theodicy (/ θ iː ˈ ɒ d ɪ s i /), in its most common form, is an attempt to answer the question of why a good God permits the manifestation of evil, thus resolving the issue of the problem of webkandii.com theodicies also address the evidential problem of evil by attempting "to make the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good or omnibenevolent God consistent with the existence.
Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil [Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Austin Farrer, E. M. Huggard] on webkandii.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
The Theodicy tries to justify the apparent imperfections of the world by claiming that it is optimal among all possible worlds. It must be the best possible and most balanced world.