The unnecessary civil war of the united states of america

This exclusion of "all persons of Japanese ancestry, both alien and non-alien," from the Pacific Coast area on a plea of military necessity in the absence of martial law ought not to be approved. Such exclusion goes over "the very brink of constitutional power," and falls into the ugly abyss of racism. In dealing with matters relating to the prosecution and progress of a war, we must accord great respect and consideration [p] to the judgments of the military authorities who are on the scene and who have full knowledge of the military facts.

The unnecessary civil war of the united states of america

Confronting Civil War Revisionism: Over the past sixty years, many groups, exploiting a general lack of public knowledge about particular movements or events, have urged upon the public various revisionist views in order to justify their particular agenda. For example, those who use activist courts to advance policies they are unable to pass through the normal legislative process defend judicial abuse by asserting three historically unfounded doctrines: These claims are directly refuted by original constitutional writings, especially The Federalist Papers.

Likewise, those who pursue a secular public square seek to justify their agenda by asserting that the Founding Fathers: A third example of historical revisionism involves the claim that the secession of the Southern States which caused the Civil War was not a result of the slavery issue but rather of oppressive federal economic policies.

For example, a plaque in the Texas State Capitol declares: We therefore pledge ourselves to preserve pure ideals; to honor our veterans; to study and teach the truths of history one of the most important of which is that the war between the states was not a rebellion nor was its underlying cause to sustain slaveryand to always act in a manner that will reflect honor upon our noble and patriotic ancestors.

Southern Secession Documents From December through Augustthe southern states met individually in their respective state conventions to decide whether to secede from the Union. On December 20,South Carolina became the first state to decide in the affirmative, and its secession document repeatedly declared that it was leaving the Union to preserve slavery: They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes [through the Underground Railroad].

A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the states north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States [Abraham Lincoln] whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. The slaveholding states will no longer have the power of self-government or self-protection [over the issue of slavery].

Experience has proved that slaveholding states cannot be safe in subjection to non-slaveholding states. The people of the North have not left us in doubt as to their designs and policy. United as a section in the late presidential election, they have elected as the exponent of their policy one [Abraham Lincoln] who has openly declared that all the states of the United States must be made Free States or Slave States.

In spite of all disclaimers and professions [i. The people of the non-slaveholding North are not, and cannot be safe associates of the slaveholding South under a common government. Citizens of the slaveholding states of the United States! South Carolina desires no destiny separate from yours.

We ask you to join us in forming a Confederacy of Slaveholding States. Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery — the greatest material interest of the world. That blow has been long aimed at the institution and was at the point of reaching its consummation.

There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.

Korematsu v. United States | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

That we do not overstate the dangers to our institution [slavery], a reference to a few facts will sufficiently prove. The hostility to this institution commenced before the adoption of the Constitution and was manifested in the well-known Ordinance of That Ordinance set forth provisions whereby the Northwest Territory could become states in the United States, and eventually the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota were formed from that Territory.

As a requirement for statehood and entry into the United States, Article 6 of that Ordinance stipulated: Signed into law by President George Washington on August 7,it retained the prohibition against slavery.

Mississippi had originally entered the United States under the requirement that it not allow slavery, and it is here objecting not only to that requirement of its own admission to the United States but also to that requirement for the admission of other states.

It has grown until it denies the right of property in slaves and refuses protection to that right on the high seas [Congress banned the importation of slaves into America in ], in the territories [in the Northwest Ordinance ofthe Missouri Compromise ofthe Compromise ofand the Kansas-Nebraska Act of ], and wherever the government of the United States had jurisdiction.

It advocates Negro equality, socially and politically. We must either submit to degradation and to the loss of property [i. In its preliminary resolutions setting forth reasons for secession, it acknowledged: All hope of preserving the Union upon terms consistent with the safety and honor of the Slaveholding States has been finally dissipated by the recent indications of the strength of the anti-slavery sentiment in the Free States.

A brief history of the rise, progress, and policy of anti-slavery and the political organization into whose hands the administration of the federal government has been committed [i.

The party of Lincoln, called the Republican Party under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party.

The unnecessary civil war of the united states of america

The prohibition of slavery in the territories, hostility to it everywhere, the equality of the black and white races, disregard of all constitutional guarantees in its favor, were boldly proclaimed by its [Republican] leaders and applauded by its followers. Only six years later in the election ofvoters gave Republicans control of the federal government, awarding them the presidency, the House, and the Senate.

The Republican agenda was clear, for every platform since its inception had boldly denounced slavery.TOP. Concurrence.

The unnecessary civil war of the united states of america

FRANKFURTER, J., Concurring Opinion. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, concurring. According to my reading of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34, it was an offense for Korematsu to be found in Military Area No. 1, the territory wherein he was previously living, except within the bounds of the established Assembly Center of .

United States, officially United States of America, abbreviated U.S. or U.S.A., byname America, country in North America, a federal republic of 50 states. Besides the 48 conterminous states that occupy the middle latitudes of the continent, the United States includes the state of Alaska, at the northwestern extreme of North America, and the island state of Hawaii, in the mid-Pacific Ocean.

Captain America: Civil War is a American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character Captain America, produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion is the sequel to 's Captain America: The First Avenger and 's Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and the thirteenth film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

United States - World War II: After World War I most Americans concluded that participating in international affairs had been a mistake.

They sought peace through isolation and throughout the s advocated a policy of disarmament and nonintervention. As a result, relations with Latin-American nations improved substantially under Hoover, an anti-imperialist.

States Rights Gist: A South Carolina General of the Civil War [Walter Brian Cisco] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Named States Rights Gist by his father, the Harvard Law School graduate went on to become a Confederate general despite his lack of formal military training.

This biography fills in the outline of Gist that . Civil war history of Texas; confederate forts and camps in Texas; battles fought in Texas; men that served in the Texas Confederacy; and the civil war POW camp in Texas.

A People's War?